“Seven Prophecies of 1933”
William Branham claimed that the Lord Jesus Christ showed him “seven major continuous visions” in 1933, which foretold “seven major events” happening before His coming.[1]
Although he claimed he saw the prophetic visions of the seven major events in 1933, he did not mention or claim he saw them until twenty years later in 1953.[2]
He specifically referred to them as “great prophecies” and claimed that “[f]ive of those things has perfectly been fulfilled exactly” as the Lord had shown him in 1933.[3]
Because he claimed that he prophesied about the alleged events after they had already happened, they are considered to be “after-the-fact” prophecies. Such prophecies that “hit the target” after-the-fact are not unlike shooting an arrow into a wall and painting a bullseye around it afterwards.[4]
To demonstrate that his “prophetic visions” were true and made before any of the events ever occurred, William Branham made many repeated claims that he had recorded them on paper in 1933. (All of those claims can be viewed here.)
Although he claimed that many people looked at the “paper”, there is no evidence that anyone ever saw it.[5] In fact, there is no evidence anywhere or eyewitness testimony from anyone to substantiate any aspect of the “prophetic visions.”
Were the prophesies true and of the Lord despite the lack of any evidence or testimony to substantiate them? Are his claims true that his visions have never failed? (i.e. “As a servant of God who has had multitudes of visions, of which NONE has ever failed...” and “And it's never failed, and it won't fail, because it's THUS SAITH THE LORD”)[6]
The Context of the “Seven Prophetic Visions”
At the onset, it is evident that the very context of the “seven prophetic visions” is unbelievable.
In the accounts of William Branham from 1960–1964 below, he provides contradictory claims of where he was, what he was doing and when he saw the “prophetic visions”,
“At that time I was just a boy: 1933, on June. I was on my way to Sunday school, and when I was getting my Bible, a vision came before me; and I was stopped in the floor.” “Conference” (60-1125).
“Said then, after that, would come to place that…come to pass that science would increase so greatly until they would invent a car, the cars would become more like “egg” all the time. And that vision was told right here where the Church of Christ stands now, at the old Mes-…orphans home. Charlie Kern, perhaps in the building tonight, was living at the place at the time. One Sunday morning about seven o’clock it happened.” “The Ephesian Church Age” (60-1205).
“You remember the vision that was read here, 1933? I was going…The church wasn’t even built. Didn’t know what a vision was, called it a “trance.” I was just a young Baptist preacher, and we were…
All my life I saw those visions, and I’ll ask anybody to rise and say if ever one of them ever failed. No, never did! It can’t! See? It won’t!
And now, and as I started the Sunday school I fell into a trance. We was having it over here at the old Masonic home, Charlie Kern’s place, little group of us. And I seen this President Roosevelt leading the world to a world war.”. . . [continues sharing the seven “prophetic visions.” ] “The Thyatirean Church Age” (60-1208).
“Now this was in 1933. I was still a missionary Baptist minister. . . .This morning I was going down to my church. I didn’t know what to call a vision. But I—I saw these things. That was many years before the world went to war, and said, “There’s a dictator now by the name of Mussolini.”. . . [continues sharing the seven “prophetic visions.” ] “Turning Northward” (61-0129).
“Now, she’s gone. Write it in your Bible; see if it’s right. 1933, one morning going to the Baptist tabernacle, I went into a trance, saw a vision. I saw President Roosevelt was going to help lead the world to a world war, told it that morning.”. . . [continues sharing the seven “prophetic visions.” ] “Jehovah-Jireh” (61-0312).
“Now, in 1933, when we were worshiping over here in the Masonic temple, where the church of Christ stands today. On one April morning, before leaving home… I was dedicating my car. I got a ’33 model car, and I was dedicating it to the Lord’s service. And in a vision, I saw the end time. Now notice how striking this is, back yonder when I was just a boy. And you can imagine what a 1933 model car looked like, now, what it looked like. And I went over there to the Masonic temple, where…Some of you old-timers in here remembers. It’s wrote down on old paper, at home. It’s already in print and went out around the world. See? That was in 1933. And I predicted that there would be some great tragedy happen to this United States before or by the year of 1977. How many remembers me saying that?” “The Seventieth Week Of Daniel” (61-0806).
“In my book in there, that I keep wrote down. In 1933, one morning, fixing to go to Sunday school, a Baptist Sunday school where I was pastor, the Holy Spirit come and showed me down to the end time, and showed me seven things that would happen. I marked them down. It’s on old yellow paper.” “The Voice Of The Sign” (64-0321E).
As is evident above, William Branham clearly was not being truthful, but was misleading people by claiming that he saw the “seven prophetic visions” as he “started the Sunday school” at the “Masonic home” and when he was “going to the Baptist tabernacle”, dedicating his car to the Lord's service “before leaving home” and getting his Bible on his way to Sunday school.
In addition, his conflicting claims that he saw the “seven prophetic visions” in April and June of 1933 are contradicted further by his claims that he saw them in 1931 and 1932.
He specifically claimed he saw the “visions” in 1931 and recorded them on paper that year as follows,
“There'll come a worship of a woman in the United States, and that'll be Mary. I seen it, thirty—1931. Seven things happened. I got it right on paper here with me, wrote it in 1931. How that I said, "This President, Franklin D. Roosevelt, he will cause all the world, help do it, send the world to war." Hadn't come to war yet, during time of the depression. I said, "Another thing..." And my mother, a square-back Democrat, if she didn't look at me hard when I said that. I said, "I don't care if there's a Republican or if he was a Socialist or whatever he is, this is THUS SAITH THE LORD." “Jezebel Religion” (61-0319).
He also specifically claimed that he saw the “visions” in 1932 and led people to believe that he had recorded 1932 as the year he saw them as follows,
“I'd like to read some things that I'd like for you to--to... This one first. I'd like to read something to you. 1932: (Listen to this.) As I was on my way... Or as I was getting ready to go on my way to church this morning, it came to pass that I fell into a vision. Our services is being held on Meigs Avenue at the old orphans' home, where Charlie Kern lives in part of the building." (He lives just across the street now, you know.)
And it came to pass that while I was in this vision I seen some dreadful things take place. I speak this in the Name of the Lord.” “Condemnation By Representation” (60-1113).
Because William Branham provided several divergent and contradictory contexts about his alleged the “prophetic visions”, his claims about them are just too obscure and questionable for them to be accepted as factual and true.
The “Seven Prophetic Visions”
Here are the “seven prophetic visions”, as provided by William Branham in his Seven Church Age Book in 1965,
-
The first vision was that Mussolini would invade Ethiopia and that nation would “fall at his steps.” That vision surely did cause some repercussions, and some were very angry when I said it and would not believe it. But it happened that way. He just walked in there with his modern arms and took over. The natives didn’t have a chance. But the vision also said that Mussolini would come to a horrible end with his own people turning on him. That came to pass just exactly as it was said.
-
The next vision foretold that an Austrian by the name of Adolph Hitler would rise up as dictator over Germany, and that he would draw the world into war. It showed the Siegfried line and how our troops would have a terrible time to overcome it. Then it showed that Hitler would come to a mysterious end.
-
The third vision was in the realm of world politics for it showed me that there would be three great ISMS, Fascism, Nazism, Communism, but that the first two would be swallowed up into the third. The voice admonished, “WATCH RUSSIA, WATCH RUSSIA. Keep your eye on the King of the North.”
-
The fourth vision showed the great advances in science that would come after the second world war. It was headed up in the vision of a plastic bubble-topped car that was running down beautiful highways under remote control so that people appeared seated in this car without a steering wheel and they were playing some sort of a game to amuse themselves.
-
The fifth vision had to do with the moral problem of our age, centering mostly around women. God showed me that women began to be out of their place with the granting of the vote. Then they cut off their hair, which signified that they were no longer under the authority of a man but insisted on either equal rights, or in most cases, more than equal rights. She adopted men’s clothing and went into a state of undress, until the last picture I saw was a woman naked except for a little fig leaf type apron. With this vision I saw the terrible perversion and moral plight of the whole world.
-
Then in the sixth vision there arose up in America a most beautiful, but cruel woman. She held the people in her complete power. I believed that this was the rise of the Roman Catholic Church, though I knew it could possibly be a vision of some woman rising in great power in America due to a popular vote by women.
-
The last and seventh vision was wherein I heard a most terrible explosion. As I turned to look I saw nothing but debris, craters, and smoke all over the land of America.
All of the other versions of the alleged “prophetic visions” of “1933” from William Branham's sermons can be read here. As is evident from those different accounts, the prophecies are not consistent with each other, but were told differently by him over time. Some of their most discrepant and contradictory aspects are identified in the sections below.
Footnotes:
[1] “Seven Church Age Book” (1965), pp. 321–323.
[2] “Israel And The Church #2” (53-0326).
[3] “By Faith Moses” (58-0720M) and “Once More” (63-1117).
[4] Kennah, John. “Controversial Prophecies”, http://people.delphiforums.com/JohnK63/prophecies.htm
[5] William Branham stated, “1933, the Holy Spirit came one morning and told me seven things that would take place before this nation was destroyed. One of them is that. It's on old paper there at the church, many has looked at it.” “Once More” (63-1117),
[6] “Seven Church Age Book”, p. 321, “Once More” (63-1117).
The “First Prophetic Vision” – Mussolini Would Invade Ethiopia
As stated, William Branham claimed in his Church Age Book of 1965 that his “first prophetic vision” foretold the following,
“The first vision was that Mussolini would invade Ethiopia and that nation would “fall at his steps.” That vision surely did cause some repercussions, and some were very angry when I said it and would not believe it. But it happened that way. He just walked in there with his modern arms and took over. The natives didn’t have a chance. But the vision also said that Mussolini would come to a horrible end with his own people turning on him. That came to pass just exactly as it was said.”
That version from 1965, however; is entirely inconsistent with and different from his earlier versions.
In the first known account of the first prophecy from March 26, 1953, William Branham made no mention of seeing Mussolini invading Ethiopia or the country coming to a “horrible end” as he did in his Church Age book in 1965, but only represented the first prophecy as follows,
“How many of you people has heard years ago down here when they was going to have me arrested down here for preaching on that mark of the beast? When I said that Mussolini, when he first come in power twenty-some-odd years ago, I said, "If Mussolini ever goes towards Ethiopia, mark this down, there'll never be peace till Jesus Christ comes."” “Israel and the Church #2” (53-0326).
In 1960, William Branham also represented the “first prophetic vision” differently by claiming that it foretold that Mussolini's invasion of Ethiopia would be his first and last invasion, as follows,
“And it came to pass that while I was in this vision I seen some dreadful things take place. I speak this in the Name of the Lord.
The president which now is, President Franklin D. Roosevelt... (Now remember, this is twenty-eight years ago.) will cause the whole world to go to war; and the new dictator of Italy, Mussolini, shall make his first invasion towards Ethiopia, and he will take Ethiopia; but that'll be his last. He shall come to his end.” “Condemnation By Representation” (60-1113).
Said, "This new dictator, Mussolini, will take his first step toward Ethiopia, and Ethiopia will fall at his feet." It did. It said, "That'll be his last. He will end in disgrace." “Conference” (60-1125).
“How that Mussolini would go towards Ethiopia, his first invasion, and would take it; that'd be the end; he'd die off after that.” “The Ephesian Church Age” (60-1205).
All of those 1960 versions of the “prophecy” are obviously false because Ethiopia was not the first or the last country that Mussolini invaded. The first country he invaded was Greece, more particularly the Greek island of Corfu, which he invaded in 1923. He also invaded other countries after invading Ethiopia in 1935, as is evident from this list,
-
Greek island of Corfu (1923),
-
Ethiopia (1935),
-
Albania (1939),
-
France (1940),
-
British Somaliliand, Sudan and Kenya (1940),
-
Egypt (1940),
-
Belgium (1940),
-
Greece (1940),
-
Yugoslavia (1941),
-
Soviet Union (1941).[7]
After making those clearly false claims about Mussolini and his alleged “first prophecy” in 1960, William Branham apparently decided to omit them from all of his later versions, including the one above that he provided in his “Church Age Book” in 1965.
All of William Branham's claims that he saw Mussolini in the “first prophetic vision” successfully taking Ethiopia are also contradicted by his claim that he saw Mussolini in the “vision” going to Ethiopia, but failing, as follows,
“I said, "Ethiopia, Mussolini will go to Ethiopia, but he'll fail."” “The Thyatirean Church Age” (60-1208).
That contradictory version of the “first prophecy” is even more remarkable because just three days prior he asserted in another sermon that the first prophecy foretold Mussolini taking Ethiopia, but dying off after that, as follows,
“How many remembers that vision here in the church? . . . How that Mussolini would go towards Ethiopia, his first invasion, and would take it; that'd be the end; he'd die off after that.” “The Ephesian Church Age” (60-1205).
Conclusions about the “first prophetic vision.”
By virtue of the fact that the “first prophetic vision” contains false and contradictory aspects, as well as discrepant aspects that changed over time, William Branham's claims about it are not credible, including these claims of his from 1963,
“Five of those things has perfectly been fulfilled exactly. How Mussolini would rise and go to Ethiopia, and fall at his steps; and he would be turned to the people, in shame, with a woman. Many, many years before it happened perfectly on the dot. And it's never failed, and it won't fail, because it's THUS SAITH THE LORD. And it's not contrary to these Bible. It's got to be.” “Once More” (63-1117).
Footnotes:
[7] Sources: “10 Countries Invaded by Fascist Italy and Why They Invaded Each One” at https://www.warhistoryonline.com/world-war-ii/10-countries-invaded-fascist-italy-invaded-one.html and “Military history of Italy during World War II” at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_history_of_Italy_during_World_War_II.
The “Second Prophetic Vision” – WWII and the Siegfried/Maginot line
William Branham also claimed in his Church Age Book that his “second prophetic vision” foretold the following about Adolph Hitler and the Siegfried Line,
“The next vision foretold that an Austrian by the name of Adolph Hitler would rise up as dictator over Germany, and that he would draw the world into war. It showed the Siegfried line and how our troops would have a terrible time to overcome it. Then it showed that Hitler would come to a mysterious end.”
In addition to being an “after-the-fact” prophecy that was made after the alleged events already occurred, the “second prophecy” was also told differently by William Branham over time and in an inconsistent, contradictory fashion.
His claims that the “second prophecy” foretold Adolph Hitler leading the world into war are contradicted by his claims that the “prophecy” foretold President Roosevelt leading the world into war,
“And now, and as I started the Sunday school I fell into a trance. We was having it over here at the old Masonic home, Charlie Kern's place, little group of us. And I seen this President Roosevelt leading the world to a world war. Predicted!” “The Thyatirean Church Age” (60-1208).
“1933, one morning going to the Baptist tabernacle, I went into a trance, saw a vision.
I saw President Roosevelt was going to help lead the world to a world war, told it that morning. They was going to lock me up for it.” “Jehovah Jireh” (61-0312).
As is clear from the two pictures below, Adolph Hitler and Franklin Delano Roosevelt bore no resemblance in appearance to each other. From Hitler's distinctively short mustache, which is recognized the world over, it is not possible to confuse him with Roosevelt.
Thus, it is clear that had William Branham ever seen Hitler in his “second prophetic vision” leading the world to war, he certainly could not have mistaken him for Roosevelt.
What's more, William Branham's claims above that his “second prophecy” foretold President Roosevelt leading the “world to a world war” are clearly false because the only world war during Roosevelt's presidency (WWII) was not caused by or the result his actions. It was caused by Nazi Germany invading Poland on September 1, 1939 and France, Great Britain, Australia, New Zealand, and India declaring war on Nazi Germany on September 3, 1939. In the two years that followed, several other countries entered the world war, but Roosevelt stayed clear of it until the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor in Hawaii on December 7, 1941. (The dates when the countries of the world entered the conflict before the United States can be viewed here.)
William Branham's claims that he saw the Germans in the “second prophetic vision” building the “Siegfried Line” are also contradicted by his other claims that he saw them in the “vision” building the “Maginot Line”, as is evident below,
“And the Siegfried Line was the German line. And the Lord let me see that, eleven years before it was built. And they never would admit getting a beating on it, the Americans wouldn't, till they almost sunk the complete army. When they went in there, the Germans had their guns just trained right out on that fleet, and let it get right in there, and almost sunk it. And I seen that, eleven years before the line was ever—ever a foundation was ever poured for it, or anything, the Siegfried Line.” “Shalom” (64-0112).
“In my book in there, that I keep wrote down. In 1933, one morning, fixing to go to Sunday school, a Baptist Sunday school where I was pastor, the Holy Spirit come and showed me down to the end time, and showed me seven things that would happen. I marked them down. It’s on old yellow paper.
Told me exactly how Germany would build that Siegfried Line, and how the Americans would take a great beating at it, eleven years before the—the line was ever built.” “The Voice of the Sign” (64-0321E).
“Write it in your bibles, see if it's right. 1933, one morning going to the Baptist tabernacle, I went into a trance, saw a vision. I saw President Roosevelt was going to help lead the world to a world war, told it that morning. They was going to lock me up for it. And I said, "They'll go to war with Germany." Eleven years before the Maginot Line was built, I said, "There..." in that same vision I saw Germany fortified in concrete.” “Jehovah-Jireh” (61-0312).
“And eleven years beforehand, it said that "We'd go to war with Germany, and Germany would be fortified behind concrete," the Maginot Line. It happened just that way.” “The Ephesian Church Age” (60-1205).
“Then I seen also that—that was eleven years before the Maginot line was built, I seen Germany fortify themselves in this big concrete place.” “Why?” (61-0128).
“And in 1933 when the Lord, when we was having meetings over here where that Church of Christ is standing now, the old Masonic home, the vision of the Lord came to me up here and predicted that, Germany would rise up and have put that Maginot Line there. Many of you remember. And how they'd be all fortified in there, and the Americans would take a great beating right there at that line. It also said what would take place, and about Roosevelt and them things, how he would run and make that fourth term. Perfectly, just exactly the way it come to pass.” “Why Are We Not A Denomination?” (58-0927).
William Branham's claims above cannot be true because the Maginot Line was never built or fortified by the Germans, but was a French Line, as its name implies. The Maginot Line also was not built in 1942, 1943 or 1944, eleven years after he allegedly saw the “prophetic vision” in 1931, 1932 or 1933, as he claimed because it was built by the French in the 1930s.[8]
In addition, his claims above cannot be true because the Siegfried Line was built between 1916 and 1917 and later again between 1938 and 1940 and therefore was not built eleven years after he saw the “vision” in 1931, 1932 or 1933, as he also claimed.[9][10]
William Branham apparently did not even understand or know the difference between the “Siegfried Line” and “Maginot Line” as is evident in this erroneous statement of his,
“France tried to build the Siegfried line, Germany, the Maginot line. And after the first World War, then France still wanted their women, wine, and big times. And they built the line, and faced all their guns towards Germany.” “Super Sign” (61-0430).
Conclusions about the “second prophetic vision.”
Based on the historical facts and when the events of WWII actually occurred, William Branham's “second prophetic vision” could not have been real or true. Had he seen Hilter or Roosevelt in a “vision” leading the world into a world war, as he claimed, he also certainly would have recognized which world leader it was from their starkly different appearances and not confused the two leaders. In addition, had God shown him that either the Siegfried or Maginot Line would be built eleven years later, one of those two battle lines would have been built then, but neither was. Consequently, William Branham's related testimony and claims about the “second prophecy” are false and unbelievable.
Footnotes:
[8] “Maginot Line, elaborate defensive barrier in northeast France constructed in the 1930s and named after its principal creator, André Maginot, who was France’s minister of war in 1929–31.” Source: https://www.britannica.com/topic/Maginot-Line
“Built between 1929 and 1938, the Maginot Line is remembered as one of the most spectacular follies in military history.” Source: https://www.warhistoryonline.com/world-war-ii/the-massive-fortifications-of-world-war-two.html
[9] “The original Siegfried Line (German language: Siegfriedstellung) was a line of defensive forts and tank defenses built by Germany as a section of the Hindenburg Line 1916–1917 in northern France during World War I. In English, Siegfried line more commonly refers to the similar World War II defensive line, built during the 1930s, opposite the French Maginot Line, which served a corresponding purpose. The Germans themselves called this the Westwall, but the Allies renamed it after the World War I line. This article deals with this second Siegfried line. The Siegfried Line was a defence system stretching more than 630 km (390 mi) with more than 18,000 bunkers, tunnels and tank traps. It went from Kleve on the border with the Netherlands, along the western border of the old German Empire as far as the town of Weil am Rhein on the border to Switzerland. More with Nazi propaganda in mind than for any strategic reason, Adolf Hitler planned the line from 1936 and had it built between 1938 and 1940.”
Source: https://military.wikia.org/wiki/Siegfried_Line
[10] “The plans for it’s construction were laid down in 1936. Work on the various elements began in 1938 and lasted until 1940. Along the Siegfried Line there were around 18,000 structures, such as bunkers, traps for tanks, and tunnels.”
The “Third Prophetic Vision” – Three “Isms”
As stated, William Branham claimed in his Church Age Book that his “third prophetic vision” foretold the following about Fascism, Nazism and Communism,
“The third vision was in the realm of world politics for it showed me that there would be three great ISMS, Fascism, Nazism, Communism, but that the first two would be swallowed up into the third. The voice admonished, “WATCH RUSSIA, WATCH RUSSIA. Keep your eye on the King of the North.”
He also claimed in his sermons that “communism will burn the Vatican city” and “The Russian empire will drop an atomic bomb of some sort on the Vatican City and destroy it in one hour”, as follows,
“Now, it's written on old paper, laying at the house today, dated way back in 1933—'32 or '33. Going to Sunday school one morning, I was caught away in a vision. And I said, “Now....” Under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, I said, “Now, there's going to be three great isms,” which is now in existence. One of them is in Rome, which is Fascism; and one of them is in Germany, which is Nazi—Nazism; and the other one is in Russia, which is communism. I said, “Those three great isms is the unclean spirits that went out of the mouth of the false prophet, and the dragons, and so forth, that will unite themselves together, speaking things that they should not; and they'll all beat at one another, until they'll finally wind up in one ism. And I predict that that will be communism. And communism will burn the Vatican City.” “The Faith That Was Once Delivered To The Saints” (55-0501E).
“How many of you people heard years ago down here when they was going to have me arrested down here for preaching on that “mark of the beast”? When I said that Mussolini, when he first come in power twenty-some-odd years ago, I said, “If Mussolini ever goes towards Ethiopia, mark this down, there will never be peace till Jesus Christ comes.” And I said, “There’ll be three great isms, Communism, Fascism, and Nazism.” And I said, “They’ll wind up in one ism, and that one ism will dominate the world and will burn the Vatican City.” You remember me saying that years and years and years ago. And just exactly that way!” “Israel And The Church #2” (53-0326).
“Now, if you'll give me one more night, if God does, I'll prove to you that communism is working straight in the hands of Almighty God to destroy the Roman... And remember, I say this as God's prophet: The Russian empire will drop an atomic bomb of some sort on the Vatican City and destroy it in one hour. THUS SAITH THE LORD.” “The Mark of the Beast” (54-0513).
There are significant problems with the “third prophecy” and his related claims above. Firstly, the “prophecy” is an “after-the-fact” prophecy that was first told on March 26, 1953, twenty years after the “prophetic vision” was allegedly seen.
Secondly, Communist Russia ended in 1991 and the Soviet Union dissolved into fifteen independent nations.[11] Therefore, it is unlikely that it would ever play any role in “swallowing up” the other “ISMS” and burning the Vatican City, unless it by some remote chance it became a communist state again. (From the Russian constitution of 1993, it is apparent that Russia is no longer a communist state, but a democratic one. Therein, it specifically identifies Russia as “a democratic, federative, law-based state with a republican form of government.”[12])
Thirdly, the Russian Empire ceased to exist in 1917 and therefore cannot drop an atomic bomb on the Vatican in accordance with William Branham's “Thus saith the Lord” prophetic
declaration.[13]
Footnotes:
[11] “The 1993 constitution declares Russia a democratic, federative, law-based state with a republican form of government.” Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics_of_Russia
[12] “Collapse of the Soviet Union, sequence of events that led to the dissolution of the Soviet Union on December 31, 1991. The former superpower was replaced by 15 independent countries: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Estonia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan.” Source:
https://www.britannica.com/event/the-collapse-of-the-Soviet-Union
[13] “The empire collapsed during the February Revolution of 1917, largely as a result of massive failures in its participation in the First World War.” Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Empire
The “Fourth Prophetic Vision” – Great Advances in Science
As stated, William Branham claimed in his Church Age Book that his “fourth prophetic vision” foretold the following,
“The fourth vision showed the great advances in science that would come after the second world war. It was headed up in the vision of a plastic bubble-topped car that was running down beautiful highways under remote control so that people appeared seated in this car without a steering wheel and they were playing some sort of a game to amuse themselves.”
The prophecy is problematic for the following reasons:
Not only is it an “after-the-fact” prophecy with no evidence to verify that it was ever made before any of the alleged events would occur, but the prophecy was changed and told very differently by William Branham over time.
When William Branham began claiming to have seen the “prophetic visions” in 1953 (twenty years after the fact), he did not claim to have seen a “plastic bubble-topped” driverless car in the vision that was “without a steering wheel” and “under remote control” with people playing a “game to amuse themselves”, as he later did.
In his first four recorded accounts of the prophecy in March 1953, May 1956, January 1957 and March 1957 that follow, it is evident that he only claimed to have seen in the vision that the cars would be “egg-shaped” or would “look like an egg”,
“I said, “Just before that time comes, that automobiles…” Which was built that old straight back, twenty years ago or twenty-five years ago. You can remember twenty years anyhow. And I said, “They’ll look like an egg. They’ll be shaped. That’s a vision.” “Israel And The Church #2” (53-0326).
“Before the Coming of the Lord, that cars would look like an egg.” How many remembers that prediction? Is there anybody left in here? Brother Seward is gone. And I guess…It was 1933 when we were having services over here. I guess just about all of them is gone now, since then.” “Teaching On Moses” (56-0513).
“And I predict that a woman will be a great woman. You younger people here tonight, remember Brother Branham has said this. And I said it in ’33, when I saw the Coming of the Lord. And how that automobiles would continually shape up like an egg, until finally they would come into a perfect egg shape. Maybe part of you here know it; it’s written on old papers and things.” “God Keeps His Word” (57-0120E).
“I seen in ’33 how cars would look before the coming of the Lord. They’re pretty near in that shape. You remember, I prophesied this… You mark it in your books… I’ve told you many times—every time here.” “Jehovah-Jireh” (57-0309E).
In June of 1957, William Branham changed the vision by claiming that the cars he saw in it were “semi-driverless” and without the need for a “steering wheel, at times”, as follows,
“And remember, thir-…1933, I saw that come in a vision, a great powerful woman will take over the whole nation, some day, that’s exactly right, before the end time, ’fore total annihilation.
The cars, in that day, will be shaped like an egg, running back like, in this form there. And it’ll be controlled by some kind of a power, that they won’t even have to use the steering wheel, at times. [Brother Branham snaps his finger once—Ed.] Just set her, and go on like that. See, before the annihilation! Now, you remember, that’s, now, that’s on record. See? And women will take over. Women will take over.” “Life” (57-0602).
Then in June of 1958, William Branham changed the vision further by claiming that the cars would be “completely driverless” and control themselves, as follows,
“Picking up, the other day, an old book up there, reading some of the things that the Lord had told, foretold; already come to pass. About this juvenile stuff, and about how the war would come out, and all those things has hit.
Just the two things left, in one of those great prophecies. That is, for cars to be on the road with remote control, looking like an egg, only you don’t drive it. It controls itself. And then there will be a great woman rise up, ’cause America is a woman’s nation. And it’ll…A great woman will rise up, and be President or something like that, in the nation. And then there will come a total annihilation. The entire nation will be wiped out.
And, that, I predict…Now this is not the Lord saying this. (The other, about the woman, it is, is the Lord.) But I predicted, in 1933, that the world would meet total annihilation before ’77.” “By Faith, Moses” (58-0720M).
Then in September 1958, William Branham claimed the “prophetic vision” was fulfilled, as follows,
“And in 1933 when the Lord, when we was having meetings over here where that Church of Christ is standing now, the old Masonic home, the vision of the Lord came to me up here and predicted that, Germany would rise up and have put that Maginot Line there. Many of you remember. And how they'd be all fortified in there, and the Americans would take a great beating right there at that line. It also said what would take place, and about Roosevelt and them things, how he would run and make that fourth term. Perfectly, just exactly the way it come to pass. And also said that cars would keep getting more like an egg, until the last days they'd be just in the shape of an egg.
Now, I said, "It'll come to pass that those cars will not be run by a steering wheel; it'll be something another run." It's them cars they're bringing out right now, remote control, for safety. Correct. You won't be able to enter into a city then, a twenty-mile zone, you can just go twenty mile. You can't hit another car, because it's remote control. See, it's going like that right now.” “Why Are We Not A Denomination?” (58-0927).
Then in August of 1961, William Branham changed the vision further and began claiming that in it he saw a family in the car playing checkers or cards, as follows,
“Now the fifth thing. “Science will progress in such a way until they will make a car that will not have to be guided by a steering wheel. And the cars will continue to be shaped like an egg, until the consummation, the end time. I seen American family going down the road, in a broad way, riding in a car with their backs turned towards where the wheel should be, looked like they were playing checkers or cards.” And we got it. It’s on television. Popular Science, Mechanics, rather, all have it. We got the car. It’s controlled by a remote control, by—by radar. They won’t even have to have any steering wheel in it. Just set your dial like this, like you dial your phone, and your car takes you right on to it; can’t wreck, nor nothing, no other cars. The magnet keeps the rest of them away from you. See? They got it. Oh, my! Think of it. Predicted thirty years before it happened!” “The Seventieth Week Of Daniel” (61-0806).
I said, "Such progress will take place!" I said, "I see automobiles looking like an egg, going down the street. There is cars go down the highways, with some kind of a control, they don't have to guide it. I seen an American family playing checker in the back of a car." They've got the car right now, if they just had the highways to put it on. The little Volkswagen is a perfect egg, just exactly, and it's all the other cars. Could you imagine, in 1933, what the cars looked like, to now? “The Voice of the Sign” (64-0321E).
“And now, it also said, “And it shall come to pass, that before the end time shall come, that automobiles will take on the shape of an egg, become more like an egg.” And I saw an American family driving down a highway in a car that…They were setting facing one another, and had a table, and were, look like, playing checkers or cards. And they didn’t have any steering wheel in the car. And it was controlled by some power without a steering wheel. How many remembers me prophesying that (see?), that’s been here?” “Questions And Answers #1” (64-0823M).
Based on the many starkly different versions and significant changes that William Branham made to his “after-the-fact” prophecy about cars over time, his claims about the alleged “prophecy” are not credible.
His claims about the “fourth prophetic vision” are also not credible because a mid-1950s advertisement for America's Independent Electric Light and Power Companies contained an illustration of a family in the back seat of a driverless car playing dominoes or similar game, which was highly similar to what he claimed he saw in the “vision.”
In that regard, former believer of William Branham, John Kennah, discovered and wrote the following,
“In 2007, it was brought to my attention by a reader of this Website (Bill Aho, who found the ad in his personal files and alerted me to it) that this car was depicted in a mid-1950's magazine as an advertisement for America's Independent Electric Light and Power Companies. This particular ad was actually published in several magazines in 1956. It shows a driverless car with a family in the back seat area playing what appears to be the game of dominoes (see photo above on left).
It seems that, once again, we have an example of where WMB has borrowed elements of a "vision" from events that had already taken place. WMB never claimed his 1933 vision depicted a self-guided car with a family playing a game in the back until long after this photo was published in 1956.
Addendum: August 4, 2015. Recently I discovered the film I had seen as a grade-schooler in a YouTube video "Believe the Sign" posted on their Facebook page. The video depicts the car on Disney's TV series, "Disneyland," in an episode called, "Magic Highway U.S.A." which aired in May, 1958--over three years before WMB first said he saw a family playing checkers in this driverless car! (see above photo on right).”[14]
The “Magic Highway U.S.A” video can be viewed here.
Footnote:
[14] Source: http://people.delphiforums.com/JohnK63/1933.htm
The “Fifth Prophetic Vision” – Moral Problem of Our Age (i.e. women)
As stated, William Branham claimed in his Church Age Book that his “fifth prophetic vision” foretold the following,
“The fifth vision had to do with the moral problem of our age, centering mostly around women. God showed me that women began to be out of their place with the granting of the vote. Then they cut off their hair, which signified that they were no longer under the authority of a man but insisted on either equal rights, or in most cases, more than equal rights. She adopted men’s clothing and went into a state of undress, until the last picture I saw was a woman naked except for a little fig leaf type apron. With this vision I saw the terrible perversion and moral plight of the whole world.”
Because William Branham was describing things about women that already existed in 1965, but claimed he saw them happening in his “fifth prophetic vision” in 1933, the alleged prophecy is not believable and cannot rightly be accepted as genuine and true without any evidence in support thereof.
Like the other prophecies, the “fifth prophecy” was told differently by William Branham over time. So dissimilar were his accounts of the “prophecy” that none of his early versions of it contain any mention from him about women voting.
In fact, it wasn't until after John F. Kennedy was elected president on November 8, 1960 that William Branham began making claims that the “vision” foretold events about women voting and electing Kennedy as the wrong man. (All of his claims that he made in his recorded sermons about his “seven prophetic visions”, which can be viewed here, clearly contain no references from him about women voting or Kennedy before the election of 1960.)
On November 13, 1960, just five days after the election, William Branham claimed that the “vision” foretold women electing the wrong man and that he had THUS SAITH THE LORD that it would happen, as follows,
“I'd like to read you a prophecy that was given. . . .1932: (Listen to this.) As I was on my way... Or as I was getting ready to go on my way to church this morning, it came to pass that I fell into a vision. . . . And it came to pass that while I was in this vision I seen some dreadful things take place. I speak this in the Name of the Lord. . . .It shall--also has been an evil thing done in this country; they have permitted women to vote. This is a woman's nation, and she will pollute this nation as Eve did Eden. Now, you see why I'm hammering the way I do. I got, THUS SAITH THE LORD. In her voting she will elect the wrong person. . . . Women, given the right to vote, elected President-elect Kennedy--by the woman's vote, the wrong man, which will finally be to full control of the Catholic church in the United States; then the bomb comes that explodes her.” “Condemnation By Representation” (60-1113).
Then on December 4, 1960, he untruthfully claimed further that the Lord Jesus Christ showed him in 1933 that women would be permitted to vote and would elect the wrong person, as follows,
“Look at the prophecy the Lord give me in '33, how it would happen, "They'd permit women to vote; in voting they'd elect the wrong person." Seven things was given; five of them's already happened. The next thing was a great woman, a church, or power or something, to take over in this United States and rule. Then I seen it just like ashes laying, where it come to the end. It was the end time.” “The Revelation of Jesus Christ” (60-1204M).
On the following day, December 5, 1960, William Branham also untruthfully claimed that the “vision” foretold John F. Kennedy being elected, as follows,
“How many remembers that vision here in the church? Sure. Said that how that even Kennedy would be elected in this last election. How that women would be permitted to vote.” “The Ephesian Church Age (Series)” (60-1205).
(Note: His claims above are also clearly false because American women were already “permitted” to vote in the United States and had been doing so since 1920 following the ratification of 19th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution on August 18, 1920.)[15])
Then on December 11, 1960, he also made the following claims,
I said, "Then I seen a... They're going to permit women and are permitting women to vote. And by voting, they'll elect the wrong man some of these days." And you did at the last election. It was the woman's votes that elected Kennedy. We know that (See?), between the crooked machines and things fixed up, that F--FBI exposed. And how could anybody... Why don't they do something about it? Why ain't something said? Ha, afraid somebody'd lose their job. You see, it's just a bunch of politics, rotten to the core. That's all. Sure. “The Laodicean Church Age” (60-1211E).
His claims that it was “the woman's votes that elected Kennedy” are patently false. John F. Kennedy was a Democrat who won the 1960 U.S. Presidential Election by a relatively slim margin of 112,827 votes.[13] And those 112,827 votes that gave him the win were not the result of women's votes. In fact, more women voted in the 1960 election for the Republican candidate, Richard Nixon, than for Kennedy, as is evident below,
“The election of 1960 saw women once again fade from political sight. Some of this was due to the ongoing campaign of the DNC to downplay the idea that there was a woman's vote, and some was due to the rise of new issues. The gender gap dropped to between 2 and 3 % in 1960 -- too small to be statistically significant but implying that women still voted more frequently for the Republican candidate. The GOP women's division proudly declared that in the last three Presidential elections a majority of women voted for the Republican Party, and a majority of Republican votes came from women. (WD-RNC 1962)”[14]
Although William Branham claimed in his Church Age Book that he saw a “woman” in the “fifth prophetic vision” who was “naked except for a little fig leaf type apron”, he claimed in sermons that the “prophetic vision” foretold women (plural) wearing “fig leaves”, as follows,
“Look at 1933, how it say the women would act in this last days…And how that women would wear garments and look like man, even like their underneath clothes; and would finally come to putting fig leaves, like, on them. How the immoral act, how they would act in this day. Look what they've done. And it's right before you, then… And I said, "Then the morals of our women is going to fall in such a degraded things, till they're going to be a disgrace to all nations. They're going to wear man's clothes. They're going to keep taking off their clothes till actually they come down like they got their underneath clothes on, that's all. And, finally, they'll come to wearing just a fig leaf." And if you notice, in last month's Life magazine, they had the woman with the fig leaves on. And that's the new evening frock, or gown, what they wear of the evening; transparent, can see through it, only the fig leaves just hides a certain spot of her body; with strapless, or strap, unstrapped bathing suits, the top of it, exposed body. And how that those things has happened!” “Broken Cisterns” (64-0726E).
“Did you see the new bathing suits they brought out? Do you know my prediction that women would finally come to fig leaves, thirty-three years ago? And now they got them that's dressed in fig leaves, transparent skirts. The Word of the Lord never fails. See? And that was to take place just before the end time, come to a fig leaf again. I was reading it in Life magazine. That was said thirty-three years ago, before women took their fall. It was told how they would do it in this day, and here they are. How they'd wear garments like man, and how they'll… The immorals of the woman would drop in this nation.” “Going Beyond The Camp” (64-0719E).
“The women… I said the women would become so immoral in the last… Now, you know thirty years ago how they dressed. Said they'd become so immoral, till they'd walk down the street with—till like—just like their underneath clothes on. And I said, "Then will come to pass, that they'll even be so disgraceful, till they'll wear something look like a fig leaf." I saw it, and they've got it; and they're wearing it. Just the—the immorality of women would get so low and degraded… We can't go no lower now; you can't go no worse. She's at the end. See, they'll never be completely nude. No, they…” “Questions And Answers #1” (64-0823M).
As is the case with William Branham's “seven prophetic visions” containing no mention of “women voting” and “electing the wrong man, Kennedy” until after the 1960 presidential election, so did he not ever mention that the “visions” foretold women wearing fig leaves until after he saw the picture of a woman wearing them in Life magazine. (All of his claims that he made in his recorded sermons about his “seven prophetic visions”, which can be viewed here, clearly reflect that.)
Because William Branham specifically claimed the “fifth prophecy” foretold “women” wearing fig leaves, a single picture in Life Magazine of just one woman wearing “fig leaves” is insufficient to represent the general population of women and demonstrate that the prophecy was fulfilled. To this day, it has not been fulfilled and probably never will be because woman have not and probably never will wear “fig leaves” on their bodies.
Footnotes:
[13] “This brings us, finally, to 1960. In that year, the canonical recitation advises us that Sen. John F. Kennedy defeated Vice President Richard Nixon in an incredibly close popular vote, 34,220,984 to 34,108,157. That’s a difference of only 112,827 votes.” Source: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/10/19/did_jfk_lose_the_popular_vote_115833.html
[14] Source: https://www.jofreeman.com/polhistory/gendergap.htm
[15] “Passed by Congress June 4, 1919, and ratified on August 18, 1920, the 19th amendment granted women the right to vote. The 19th amendment guarantees all American women the right to vote.” Source: https://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=false&doc=63
“Presidential Election, 1920 - Warren G. Harding (Republican) defeated James Cox (Democrat). Following the ratification of the 19th amendment to the Constitution, this was the first presidential election where women could vote.” Source: http://www.americanpast.org/voting/preselections3.html
The “Sixth Prophetic Vision” – A Most Beautiful, but Cruel Woman
William Branham also claimed in his Church Age Book that his “sixth prophetic vision” foretold the following:
“Then in the sixth vision there arose up in America a most beautiful, but cruel woman. She held the people in her complete power. I believed that this was the rise of the Roman Catholic Church, though I knew it could possibly be a vision of some woman rising in great power in America due to a popular vote by women.”
Although he suggested a dual interpretation of the woman in the vision—either the Roman Catholic Church or a woman rising to great power in America—William Branham made various other claims in his sermons that contradict this interpretation.
In earlier statements, Branham exclusively interpreted the woman as a female political leader who will become a “great ruler” in the United States:
“Now remember, I still say this: “Before the end time comes…” Wrote twenty-three years ago. “Before the end time comes, there’ll be a woman, that’ll be a great ruler in this nation. She will either be president or something on that order, some great woman.” “The Faith That Was Once Delivered To The Saints” (55-0501E).
“I predict that a woman will be president before we’re annihilated” “God's Covenant With Abraham” (56-0428).
However, in later statements, he directly contradicted those claims by presenting a church as the definitive interpretation of the woman in the vision, predicting that it would govern the United States:
“Of five of those seven predictions, has already happened. The church to take a hold, the Catholic church. And the coming of the end time. And I said, “I seen, looked like there was stumps burning; rocks, blowed out; and the whole United States just looked bare, laying like that, as far as I could see where I was standing.” And I said, “I predict, according to the way time is moving, it’ll be sometime between this year ’33 and ’77.” “The Thyatirean Church Age” (60-1208).
“And I seen a great woman rise up, beautiful to look at, but a cruel wicked heart. And that will be a church. And she’s on her road now.” “Jehovah-Jireh” (61-0312).
“And in this would be a woman stand up that would govern the United States; not actually a woman, but a church. Then I seen her with nothing but ashes. It’s going to happen.” “Once More” (63-1117).
This shift from a political leader to a religious figure introduces significant ambiguity regarding the nature and role of the woman in his prophecy. Such inconsistencies in the woman’s identity undermine the reliability of the prophecy.
Divine Revelation vs. Personal Beliefs:
Branham’s statements about his alleged sixth vision also are conflicted in terms of him presenting the predictions as divine revelation and personal beliefs.
For example, he presented his predictions of a woman ruling the United States as divine revelation, as follows,
“There’ll be a great, powerful woman raise up, either be President, or dictator, or some great powerful woman in this United States. And she’ll sink, under the influence of women. Now, you remember, that’s THUS SAITH THE LORD.” “Why Are We Not A Denomination? (58-0927).
“And remember, THUS SAITH THE LORD there will be a woman rule before the end time.” “From That Time” (60-0716 ).
However, in other statements, he shifted to presenting the predictions as merely being personal beliefs, by stating,
“And you remember, I’ve already predicted in 1933, a woman would rule this nation before the chaos, by the annihilation.” “Life” (58-0512).
“Now, I predicted, and have said, “I saw a great woman stand up, beautiful-looking, dressed in real highly royal-like purple.” And I got little parenthesis down here, '(She was a great ruler in the United States; perhaps the Catholic church.)'” “The Seventieth Week Of Daniel” (61-0806).
This inconsistency between claiming divine authority and expressing personal predictions undermines the credibility of the prophecy.
Conclusions about the “sixth prophetic vision.”
By examining William Branham's predictions about a woman ruling the United States, it becomes clear that his claims are fraught with contradictions and inconsistencies. His evolving descriptions and inconsistent claims about divine revelation versus personal opinion undermine the credibility of his prophecies. Given these issues, it is reasonable to conclude that Branham's predictions about a woman ruling the United States lack the authenticity and reliability expected of true prophetic insight.
The “Seventh Prophetic Vision” – America's Destruction
As stated, William Branham claimed the following about his “seventh prophetic vision” in his Church Age Book,
“The last and seventh vision was wherein I heard a most terrible explosion. As I turned to look I saw nothing but debris, craters, and smoke all over the land of America.”
As is evident from his other recorded accounts of the “vision” below, he never claimed in any of them that he “heard a most terrible explosion”, but only that he “saw” the nation or United States in a devastated or annihilated condition,
“And then there will come a total annihilation. The entire nation will be wiped out.
. . . So, I didn’t know then that they had something that could annihilate it like they got now, but I seen the nation in total annihilation, just stumps of trees and things like that, left.” “By Faith, Moses” (58-0720M).
“Then I seen the United States as one smoldering, burnt-over place. It will be near the end.” “Condemnation by Representation” (60-1113).
“Then I turned to look and I seen the United States was a smoldering something had burned it up. And down beneath there I said, not in the trance, but, 'I predict…' (remember this, I guess this is taped too), 'I predict that these things will take place between now, 1933 and 1977.'” “Conference” (60-1125).
“Now another thing it said, that…Then immediately after that, I saw this nation become as a smolder, just blowed to bits.” “The Ephesian Church Age” (60-1205).
“I said, “Then I looked again, and I saw the United States just blowed to pieces. There wasn’t nothing left on it.” . . . And I said, 'I seen, looked like there was stumps burning; rocks, blowed out; and the whole United States just looked bare, laying like that, as far as I could see where I was standing.' . . . And I said, 'I predict, according to the way time is moving, it’ll be sometime between this year ’33 and ’77.'” “The Thyatirean Church Age” (60-1208).
“Over the nation it looked just like where rocks was blowed out and stumps was smoldering, and—and so forth.” “Turning Northward” (61-0129).
“Then I seen the end time when the United States looked like a big bunch of bursted up stones and things like that, just blowed out, smoldering everywhere.” “Jehovah-Jireh” (61-0312).
“It’s wrote down on old paper, at home. It’s already in print and went out around the world. See? That was in 1933. And I predicted that there would be some great tragedy happen to this United States before or by the year of 1977.
. . . Now, then, after that, I turned and looked. And I saw this United States burning like a smolder, rocks had been blowed up. And it was burning like a—a heap of fire in logs, or something that just set it afire. And looked as far as I could see, and she had been blown up. And then the vision left me.” “The Seventieth Week Of Daniel” (61-0806).
“And in this would be a woman stand up that would govern the United States; not actually a woman, but a church. Then I seen her with nothing but ashes. It’s going to happen.” “Once More” (63-1117).
William Branham also provided the following starkly different version of the alleged “seventh vision” in which he made his first and only claim that a Voice spoke to him and told him to “look back East again” (from where he allegedly was in Indiana),
“Then I said, "Finally, He told me to look back East again. And, when I did, I seen, looked like, as it was, the world had exploded. And as far as I could see, was nothing but sticks, and—and smoldering rocks had been blowed up out of the earth." And these were to happen before the end of the world. And five of the seven has already happened, in thirty-three years. There we are, back to the end time!'” “Broken Cisterns” (64-0726E).
In his statements above, he also made his first and only claim that it looked like “the world had exploded”, which contradicts his other claims that it was the “United States” that he saw in the “vision” in a blown-up condition.
William Branham contradicted himself further by claiming, as he did above, that he predicted in 1933 that the “United States” would be annihilated “before or by the year of 1977” and claiming on other occasions that he predicted in 1933 that the “entire earth” and “world” would be annihilated before 1977, as follows,
“But between now and '77, I predict that either a great destruction or a total annihilation of the entire earth, between now and '77. I predicted it in 1933.” “Teaching On Moses” (56-0513).
“But I predicted, in 1933, that the world would meet total annihilation before ’77.” “By Faith, Moses” (58-0720M).
He also claimed that he had “Divine inspiration” that the world systems would end by 1977, as follows,
“And though many may feel that this is an irresponsible statement in view of the fact that Jesus said that “no man knoweth the day nor the hour.” I still maintain this prediction after thirty years because, Jesus did NOT say no man could know the year, month or week in which His coming was to be completed. So I repeat, I sincerely believe and maintain as a private student of the Word, along with Divine inspiration that 1977 ought to terminate the world systems and usher in the millennium.” “An Exposition Of The Seven Church Ages - 9 - The Laodicean Church Age”
Conclusion:
William Branham's seventh prophetic vision, which purportedly predicted the destruction of America, is rife with inconsistencies and contradictions. Initially, Branham described witnessing the United States in a state of devastation, yet he later claimed to have heard a terrible explosion and even suggested the entire world had exploded. These shifts in his narrative undermine the credibility of his prophecy.
Furthermore, Branham's claim that the United States or the entire world would be annihilated by 1977 did not come to pass, further discrediting his visions. His assertion that he received divine inspiration predicting the end of world systems by 1977, and his contradictory statements regarding whether it was America or the whole world that would face destruction, only add to the skepticism.
The lack of any documented evidence or witness testimony to substantiate that these visions were made in 1933, as Branham repeatedly claimed, further diminishes their reliability. Given these numerous inconsistencies, contradictions, and the failure of the predictions to come true, William Branham's alleged seventh vision cannot be accepted as a genuine prophecy.